SIP Status Reports

You are here: EPA Home > Air Quality Implementation Plans > SIP Status Reports > National Status of a Ozone-1Hr (1979) SIP Required Element

National Status of a Ozone-1Hr (1979) SIP Required Element

Required Element: Enhanced Monitoring (PAMS)
NOTE: As of 03/12/2021, these reports are no longer being updated. For the latest information, see the SIP Status Tools.

Return to: Required Element Selection    NAAQS Selection

Required Element: Enhanced Monitoring (PAMS)
For Pollutant: Ozone-1Hr (1979)    

State Area Name Deadline Submittal Date Latest Action Date of Latest Action FR Citation
Click to view
FR notice
CaliforniaEast Kern County Area See Note 11/10/1993 Redesignation approved 06/21/2004 69 FR 21731
CaliforniaLos Angeles-South Coast Air Basin Area See Note 11/10/1993 Approval 10/30/2017 82 FR 45191
CaliforniaSacramento Metro Area See Note 11/10/1993 Approval 10/30/2017 82 FR 45191
CaliforniaSan Diego Area See Note 11/10/1993 Approval 10/30/2017 82 FR 45191
CaliforniaSan Joaquin Valley Area See Note 11/10/1993 Approval 10/30/2017 82 FR 45191
CaliforniaSoutheast Desert Modified AQMA Area See Note 11/15/1993 Approval 10/30/2017 82 FR 45191
CaliforniaVentura County Area See Note 11/10/1993 Approval 10/30/2017 82 FR 45191
ConnecticutGreater Connecticut Area See Note 03/02/1995 Approval 12/23/1997 62 FR 55336
ConnecticutNew York-N. New Jersey-Long Island Area See Note 03/02/1995 Approval 12/23/1997 62 FR 55336
DelawarePhiladelphia-Wilmington-Trenton Area See Note 03/24/1994 Approval 09/11/1995 60 FR 47081
District of ColumbiaWashington Area See Note 01/14/1994 Approval 11/13/1995 60 FR 47081
GeorgiaAtlanta Area See Note 11/08/1993 Approval 11/07/1994 59 FR 46176
IllinoisChicago-Gary-Lake County Area See Note 11/04/1993 Approval 04/26/1994 59 FR 9091
IllinoisSt. Louis Area See Note   Redesignation approved 05/12/2003 68 FR 25442
IndianaChicago-Gary-Lake County Area See Note 11/04/1993 Approval 05/16/1994 59 FR 12168
LouisianaBaton Rouge Area See Note 09/16/1993 Approval 08/19/1996 61 FR 31035
MarylandBaltimore Area See Note 03/24/1994 Approval 11/13/1995 60 FR 47081
MarylandPhiladelphia-Wilmington-Trenton Area See Note 03/24/1994 Approval 11/13/1995 60 FR 47081
MarylandWashington Area See Note 03/24/1994 Approval 11/13/1995 60 FR 47081
MassachusettsBoston-Lawrence-Worcester (E. Mass) Area See Note 11/15/1993 Approval 09/12/1997 62 FR 37510
MassachusettsSpringfield (W. Mass) Area See Note 11/15/1993 Approval 09/12/1997 62 FR 37510
MissouriSt. Louis Area See Note 12/06/2002 Approval 05/12/2003 68 FR 25418
New HampshireBoston-Lawrence-Worcester Area See Note 04/19/1994 Approval 12/26/1997 62 FR 55521
New HampshirePortsmouth-Dover-Rochester Area See Note 04/19/1994 Approval 12/26/1997 62 FR 55521
New JerseyNew York-N. New Jersey-Long Island Area See Note 11/15/1993 Approval 07/30/1997 62 FR 35100
New JerseyPhiladelphia-Wilmington-Trenton Area See Note 11/15/1993 Approval 07/30/1997 62 FR 35100
New YorkNew York-N. New Jersey-Long Island Area See Note 08/12/1998 Approval 06/11/2001 66 FR 23849
PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia-Wilmington-Trenton Area See Note 10/05/1994 Approval 09/11/1995 60 FR 47081
Rhode IslandProvidence (all of RI) Area See Note 01/14/1994 Approval 12/30/1996 61 FR 55897
TexasBeaumont-Port Arthur Area See Note 11/15/1993 Approval 12/05/1994 59 FR 50502
TexasEl Paso Area See Note 11/15/1993 Approval 12/05/1994 59 FR 50502
TexasHouston-Galveston-Brazoria Area See Note 11/15/1993 Approval 12/05/1994 59 FR 50502
VirginiaWashington Area See Note 11/14/1994 Approval 11/13/1995 60 FR 47081
WisconsinMilwaukee-Racine Area See Note 11/15/1993 Approval 03/18/1994  
We have made our best effort to ensure that the data contained in these reports is accurate. We note that there may be brief delays in updating the reports as we receive new state submissions and we take rulemaking action on plans. In order to assist us in providing accurate information, we request that you contact us by clicking on the "Contact Us" link near the top of this page with any comments regarding or corrections to the posted information, including concerns about whether the entries reflect the most recent status.